Quantum vs Classical
Small experiments. Measurable results. Clear execution sources.
Quantum claims.
Meet actual experiments.
Explore correlations, randomness and interference. Run an ideal quantum circuit simulation beside a classical sampler of the same distribution.
Local simulation · No wallet or API key neededChoose your experiment
Two correlated bits: ideal measurements produce only 00 or 11. This single measurement basis can also be reproduced classically; it is not a Bell inequality test.
H(q0) → CX(q0, q1) → measureShots are repeated measurements. A seed reproduces the counts; timings vary. Software pseudorandomness is not quantum-generated or cryptographic randomness.
Same question.
Two approaches.
Run your first comparison to see measured frequencies, runtime and deviation from the ideal distribution.
Know what ran.
Both approaches execute on your device’s classical CPU. The simulator evolves four complex amplitudes using ideal gates; the baseline uses coin flips or a closed-form probability to reproduce the same measurement distribution. The two approaches use separate seeded random streams.
No real quantum hardware, noise model, mining reward, subnet API or subnet-powered result is involved. This release covers small circuits and sampling; route optimization and verified hardware integrations are not enabled. No experiment data leaves this lab.
Local device energy is not measured. Correlation in this one measurement basis does not certify entanglement on hardware or demonstrate a computational advantage.